Increasing turnover

Do you think your kick/stroke pattern is a true 6Beat kick or is there a possibility that you actually end up over kicking? During the full stroke execution I mean? By over kicking you mean that my amplitude is larger than optimal right? I am sure my frequency is correct, but I could be kicking outside the bucket. Because if you are indeed using a 6Beat kick pattern, then it is either of the following two things: Your kicking rate is too slow, or it is being slowed down by your pulling action. If you are indeed overkicking then you probably found your problem. In this case I'd add the 6beatkick to 1 arm progression to the list of drill, putting emphasis on the respect of the 6beat clock. YouTube - Freestyle 6beat kicking to 1arm progression Note how the kid on the clip is catching very early, almost immediately after the arm entry? This is because not having the other arm to help, this drill forces him to do so in order to lessen the dead spot in propulsion. This is where this drill comes in handy, that combined with the opportunity to properly time the stroke kick relative to pull (6beat). Note also that the first part is just like one arm but without any arm. Body roll kick breathing, all the same. Say you manage to master it (it's not easy I'm telling you) then if you can 6Beat/Body roll fast enough this becomes your new turnover given that your pulling action doesn't slow down this 6tick clock. The worst cases on earth in term of turnover rate can sometimes add the fist pulling as a drill. Full stroke 6beat while pulling with fists instead of open hands. It's like a kick in the butt, a wakeup call with a full bucket of icy water. The drill from the video is the kind of stuff I am looking for. Thanks. Fist drill certainly gets my arms around faster. I feel like I am just slinging my arms around totally out of control. Maybe if I slinged in a more controlled fashion it would be more beneficial?

When I watch videos from 10 years ago it looks to me sprinting has changed considerably, namely turnover. Like in the Popov days. When they sprinted back then, it looks like the style doesn't change much from longer races. But when I watch the resent sprinting it looks like it's a totally different style than longer races altogether. Is this true? It is worth remembering that Popov is still the fastest swimmer recorded without a tech suit. I would be happy to have Popov's turn over or SPL.

We did a couple drills in college for turnover. One was called spin drill. Which was a fist drill but try to spin arms as fast as possible with no technique. We did it like 6 x 25 (12.5 spin/12.5 ez) The other thing we used alot for turnover was the long belt stretch cord. We swim to the other side of the pool. Rest. Push off and its all out sprint and the cord is pulling you so fast that you have to learn to speed up the turnover or the cord will start to pull you under. Other swimmers can be up by the block pulling the cord back faster if you do not have a high tension cord.

By over kicking you mean that my amplitude is larger than optimal right? I am sure my frequency is correct, but I could be kicking outside the bucket. Good good. We're getting down to serious business here. By overkicking, I actually meant giving more than 6 beat per full cycle, or more than 3 beat per arm stroke. The thing with stroke rate, especially in the context of FreeStyle sprinting (hence the fact that I asked you for clarifications prior issuing any recommendations) is that it is part of a Clock. The smallest component of this clock is a foot kick. You have 6 of them per cycle. So we can not really discuss on how to increase turn over without this consideration. Slow turnover in sprint situation is likely due to more than 6 kicks being done per cycle (which of course slows down the turnover) or the kick (the clock) to be slowed down by the pulling action. To be honest with you I see the later being a common cause more often than the former. Now, you mentioned about amplitude of the kick. An amplitude that is too wide could expect why the kick slows down the whole rate of execution. This is a possibility. One thing is sure though, the drill showed earlier in the clip can be included in a very fun technical progression which always pay off. You go 25m kick only (focus on kick), 25m one arm (focus on kick), 25m the other arm (focus on kick), 25m sprint focusing on kick (making sure that its rate doesn't slow down). The bit with the kick only, like I previously said, is hard to get to grip. But I am telling you, it is very rewarding when you finally get it. Although the kid on the clip is extraordinary talented (1:53 over 200m age 15), when I first approached him to do the clip, he had never performed this drill before (matter of fact, I invented this drill for myself. Other coaches have probably invented this before but it is not well documented). His execution isn't perfect. I will post a clip soon that clearly shows how it should be done. Your ability to execute it fast should immediately translate into higher turnover given that the pulling doesn't slow down this vital 6 beat clock.

In sprinting 50M I think there's less time to fully complete the push back of the stroke. For me I can only maintain a good sprint for about 11 seconds, after that my body just runs out of steam and moves slow. I wish there were 25 Meter events

somewhat obvious "don't pause out front" I'm pretty sure this is where my problem is. Is this pause even supposed to be a fundamental part of the stroke? because it is for mine. Is this a fundamental technical flaw or partly just being out of shape or not trying hard enough? I fool around with increasing stroke rate in the middle of a set and I initially feel lighter in the water and my times improve slightly, but then it makes me tired and I revert back to my slower stroke.

"Too many swimmers focus on pushing their hand back at the end of the stroke, which just delays getting it back to the power position". ""hand's aren't pushing back far enough" knowing it was obsolete " One of my favorite freestyle instructional videos of Lindsay Benco stresses "completing the stroke all the way past your hip". Has emphasis on this phase of the stroke become obsolete, and a quicker recovery considered more efficient? Also the coach yells, "Thumbs down your sides!" Does this still apply? Thanks, Georgio :drown:

Anyone have any good suggestions for increasing turnover other than the obvious? Just a different voice here. I like your turn over, have seen several good swimmers adopting your style and having massive success with it. The best of all (unfortunately no footage available, it dates back to early '90s) is called Stephan Hebert. 49 something over 100m free, 1:47 over 200. Missed the Olympic qualifiers not because of his potential to perform, but due to an inherent lack of potential to perform under extremely high pressure. It needs to be improved since speed is function of DPS * Turnover but it doesn't have to be drastically improved in order to allow you to meet your goals. One other way to simply put it. Preserve your stroke count. Period. Then any improvement made on speed will be the result of progressively improving turnover as a result of pure fitness improvement (as opposed to resulting from a full revolution in your technique). If you preserve your stroke count though, increasing turn over dramatically would translate into increasing your speed dramatically. And that would only come as a result of drastic improvements in your fitness. (just my two cents).

As a mostly distance swimmer in all stroke, I can't seem to increase turnover without getting way tired ! That's probably because you're good enough technically to do so without loosing water (DPS). Given a glide time of 5sec followed by 18 strokes per 25m (scm), a 1500 is done in 24min flat at 60spm, and almost 23min flat at 63. So if one's pb over 1500 is close to 24, just increasing the rate by 1 or 2 stroke without scarifying any DPS should feel much harder. Increasing turn over isn't like I don't know, recovering the arm with finger close to the surface or kicking from the hips. For someone that already swims relatively well, increasing turnover is more affected by fitness than by technique per se. It's not something you'd go like hey! Today I will increase my rate turnover by 5-10strokes per minute and my performances should improve. I think that when one gets close to the ideal balance between rate and length, the improvement in turn over can be better done with a pacing tool such as SwimSmooth's wetronome (or any other device that allows you to precisely set the desired rate at which key sets should be swam). It's also possible to modify the balance between rate and lengths though. Based on how I feel, I sometimes begin sets adding one stroke per 25 (deliberately that is) in order to make room for an increased rate. I'd do this to make the set little more cardio, little less muscle intensive. Overall performances may benefit from this "reconfiguration". However, well, you do it with a stroke or 2 per 25, that doesn't leave that much room for more turn over. "Too many swimmers focus on pushing their hand back at the end of the stroke, which just delays getting it back to the power position". I'd tend to agree here, especially if the goal is to increase turnover. One of my favorite freestyle instructional videos of Lindsay Benco stresses "completing the stroke all the way past your hip". Too bad this video has been removed from Youtube due to copyrights violation. It was indeed one of the best freestyle clip available there. Has emphasis on this phase of the stroke become obsolete, and a quicker recovery considered more efficient? To a certain extent yes. It's very easy though to aim for a balance here. If you loose DPS as a result of this (cutting on final pulling push), then you may have cut too much. Therefore the idea here is to constantly asses both DPS and time (as well as rate if possible but this is more complicated especially without a pacing device) Also the coach yells, "Thumbs down your sides!" Does this still apply? If this is to favor recovering the arm whilst keeping the shoulder "unlocked" yes. It still applies. I like to evaluate this on a case per case basis though.

As a mostly distance swimmer in all stroke, I can't seem to increase turnover without getting way tired !