200 on 3:05
2x200 on 2:55
4x200 on 2:45
2x200 on 2:35
200 on 2:25
this set is 2000 long course meters
200 on 3:05
2x200 on 2:55
4x200 on 2:45
2x200 on 2:35
200 on 2:25
this set is 2000 long course meters
It seems like a good "fitness" set. One I might do in the first few weeks of the season to build my base. But I prefer something with a little more to it than just "make these intervals," not that sets of that sort don't have their uses!
This was my main set yesterday:
3x100 @ 1:15 Aerobic
2x25 @ :20
75 @ 1:00
25 @ :20
3x75 @ 1:00 Aerobic
2x25 @ :25
75 @ 1:15
2x25 @ :25
3x50 @ :45 Aerobic
2x25 @ :25
75 @ 1:15
2x25 @ :25
200 EZ
100 Rehearsal Swim (off the blocks)
Each time the 25s and 75s were all at 200 pace or faster (this particular time I was faster than pace on the 25s but just a hair off pace on the 75s). I like to do speed work with target paces in mind. The 100s, 75s, and 50s Aerobic were like an "active recovery," as there were no extra breaks in the set.
Shouldn’t see it like that. Different strokes for different folks. Not sure your precise back ground or age, and those should factor into whether you look at a set as written and say “that indicates I am slower/faster than I thought.”
I always considered 10x200/3:00 hold <2:30 to be a mark of excellent fitness for me.
10x200/3:00 backstroke hold <2:45 was a real landmark. I'm not sure if I ever cleanly got it, maybe a 2:47 in there toward the end kind of thing...