No sandbagging: It's the law

The anti-sandbag law: "if a swimmer enters an event with a time significantly slower or faster than that swimmer's recorded time in the past two years, the meet director may, after a discussion with the swimmer, change the seeded time to a realistic time" (104.5.5.A(10)). Concerning my Auburn nationals entry, I confess, when faced with a 7 hour 2 stop flight and 3:45 nonstop at an earlier time, I did what any warm-blooded middle-aged American swimmer with low self-esteem would do--sandbag my entry so I could catch the earlier flight, thus diminishing the possible time spent sitting next to a 400 pound Alabama slammer with sleep apnea wearing nothing but overalls and body odor. Of course, I was caught in my bold fabrication and my time was "fixed." USMS seems to have an identity problem. Are we hard core with rigid qualifying times? It would seem not as 2 of my not-so-speedy family members were allowed to swim four events last year in Puerto Rico. If we are not hard core, why does anybody care that I sandbag? More to the point, why can one person enter a crappy time and another cannot? Just wondering.:)
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Would it be proper in a mixed gender meet to provide a check off box on meet entry forms for female swimmers to get preferential lane assignments? Maybe they could be seeded one heat lower to allow them to get out ahead of us 230 pound plus swimmers and the choas we create with our wake. Personaly, I would love to get bumped up a heat for the competition aspect value in itself.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Would it be proper in a mixed gender meet to provide a check off box on meet entry forms for female swimmers to get preferential lane assignments? Maybe they could be seeded one heat lower to allow them to get out ahead of us 230 pound plus swimmers and the choas we create with our wake. Personaly, I would love to get bumped up a heat for the competition aspect value in itself.
Children
No Data