The anti-sandbag law:
"if a swimmer enters an event with a time significantly slower or faster than that swimmer's recorded time in the past two years, the meet director may, after a discussion with the swimmer, change the seeded time to a realistic time" (104.5.5.A(10)).
Concerning my Auburn nationals entry, I confess, when faced with a 7 hour 2 stop flight and 3:45 nonstop at an earlier time, I did what any warm-blooded middle-aged American swimmer with low self-esteem would do--sandbag my entry so I could catch the earlier flight, thus diminishing the possible time spent sitting next to a 400 pound Alabama slammer with sleep apnea wearing nothing but overalls and body odor. Of course, I was caught in my bold fabrication and my time was "fixed."
USMS seems to have an identity problem. Are we hard core with rigid qualifying times? It would seem not as 2 of my not-so-speedy family members were allowed to swim four events last year in Puerto Rico. If we are not hard core, why does anybody care that I sandbag? More to the point, why can one person enter a crappy time and another cannot? Just wondering.:)
Which time is it that a sandbagger is misrepresenting.
It is MY definition, but I would say: the time you think you'll go in a meet.
What is the purpose of an entry time in a meet? Putting aside circle-seeding, to put you in a heat of similar times. This provides the most competition and the shortest timeline.
Just because completely accurate predictions are impossible doesn't mean you do away with the idea of entry times, as Patrick seems to be indirectly arguing. Most science would stop today if this were a valid argument.
Which time is it that a sandbagger is misrepresenting.
It is MY definition, but I would say: the time you think you'll go in a meet.
What is the purpose of an entry time in a meet? Putting aside circle-seeding, to put you in a heat of similar times. This provides the most competition and the shortest timeline.
Just because completely accurate predictions are impossible doesn't mean you do away with the idea of entry times, as Patrick seems to be indirectly arguing. Most science would stop today if this were a valid argument.