The anti-sandbag law:
"if a swimmer enters an event with a time significantly slower or faster than that swimmer's recorded time in the past two years, the meet director may, after a discussion with the swimmer, change the seeded time to a realistic time" (104.5.5.A(10)).
Concerning my Auburn nationals entry, I confess, when faced with a 7 hour 2 stop flight and 3:45 nonstop at an earlier time, I did what any warm-blooded middle-aged American swimmer with low self-esteem would do--sandbag my entry so I could catch the earlier flight, thus diminishing the possible time spent sitting next to a 400 pound Alabama slammer with sleep apnea wearing nothing but overalls and body odor. Of course, I was caught in my bold fabrication and my time was "fixed."
USMS seems to have an identity problem. Are we hard core with rigid qualifying times? It would seem not as 2 of my not-so-speedy family members were allowed to swim four events last year in Puerto Rico. If we are not hard core, why does anybody care that I sandbag? More to the point, why can one person enter a crappy time and another cannot? Just wondering.:)
Please don't read into motivations. I doubt very much that Erwin "dodges" anyone and I don't know him well enough to ask why he generally under-predicts his time. I was just using him as one example and was not trying to point fingers.I don't know Jeff at all, but he's as consistent with his pace as with his entry times -- both are faster than you'd like when you're racing him:)
Please don't read into motivations. I doubt very much that Erwin "dodges" anyone and I don't know him well enough to ask why he generally under-predicts his time. I was just using him as one example and was not trying to point fingers.I don't know Jeff at all, but he's as consistent with his pace as with his entry times -- both are faster than you'd like when you're racing him:)
