The anti-sandbag law:
"if a swimmer enters an event with a time significantly slower or faster than that swimmer's recorded time in the past two years, the meet director may, after a discussion with the swimmer, change the seeded time to a realistic time" (104.5.5.A(10)).
Concerning my Auburn nationals entry, I confess, when faced with a 7 hour 2 stop flight and 3:45 nonstop at an earlier time, I did what any warm-blooded middle-aged American swimmer with low self-esteem would do--sandbag my entry so I could catch the earlier flight, thus diminishing the possible time spent sitting next to a 400 pound Alabama slammer with sleep apnea wearing nothing but overalls and body odor. Of course, I was caught in my bold fabrication and my time was "fixed."
USMS seems to have an identity problem. Are we hard core with rigid qualifying times? It would seem not as 2 of my not-so-speedy family members were allowed to swim four events last year in Puerto Rico. If we are not hard core, why does anybody care that I sandbag? More to the point, why can one person enter a crappy time and another cannot? Just wondering.:)
Being dismissive of the effects of second hand smoke and the effects of sandbagging in a masters meet are in the same category of offense? Hmm ... And are you not just as dismissive of the opposing viewpoint?
Fine, you are stuck on the analogy thing. Sandbagging is cutting in line at the supermarket. Or taking up two parking spaces in a lot. Happy?
What is the opposing viewpoint, that it isn't a big deal? I've said as much. The effect is small, but not zero. Normally I don't think much on it, but here we have a thread. If there is ever a thread about people who double-park maybe I will express my annoyance with that practice too.
Being dismissive of the effects of second hand smoke and the effects of sandbagging in a masters meet are in the same category of offense? Hmm ... And are you not just as dismissive of the opposing viewpoint?
Fine, you are stuck on the analogy thing. Sandbagging is cutting in line at the supermarket. Or taking up two parking spaces in a lot. Happy?
What is the opposing viewpoint, that it isn't a big deal? I've said as much. The effect is small, but not zero. Normally I don't think much on it, but here we have a thread. If there is ever a thread about people who double-park maybe I will express my annoyance with that practice too.