Michael Phelps and a bong? Is there any truth to this?

I'm a little late in reading this thread, but Hoo-Ray for Fortress for her investigative abilities. Carlos? Comments? Donna Uh. Yeah. I've commented that post plenty. Right after it, even. On the same page. Look. A clique of posters on this board picked a fight w/ me last summer. In that "discussion" they questioned my swimming abilities and talked smack about swimming. I ignored it. They also went on ratemyprofessors.com and claimed to have found me, but all they found was an engineering prof at UC Berkeley who happens to have miserable student evals. And I ignored that b/c any idiot would know that engineering classes do no delve into ethnomusicology, gender and cultural studies, which is what I do. In this thread Geek made a snide remark about my swimming again. So I didn't ignore it. The point is: if you're going to slander somebody's swimming abilities, at the very least do the minimal work and figure out who the heck you're dealing with. Yea, I think even Stud, with his british backing and attraction to football would have figured out you weren't talking about Fort. But, I do have one question, you asked them to "put-up or shut-up" so, why haven't you gonna ahead to put your times up? The times were linked. There was no need. I think that if you are going to make a challenge to someone, then why not put your's out there first. Be proud of your times. If you are faster...great...if not...great too. It wasn't about being fast, faster, slower or anything. I find that attitude counter-productive to the general good will that defines masters swimming and masters athletics overall. It's calling out geek and stud for dissing a fellow swimmer for the sake of an Innernets fight.

I'm a little late in reading this thread, but Hoo-Ray for Fortress for her investigative abilities. Carlos? Comments? Donna Uh. Yeah. I've commented that post plenty. Right after it, even. On the same page. Look. A clique of posters on this board picked a fight w/ me last summer. In that "discussion" they questioned my swimming abilities and talked smack about swimming. I ignored it. They also went on ratemyprofessors.com and claimed to have found me, but all they found was an engineering prof at UC Berkeley who happens to have miserable student evals. And I ignored that b/c any idiot would know that engineering classes do no delve into ethnomusicology, gender and cultural studies, which is what I do. In this thread Geek made a snide remark about my swimming again. So I didn't ignore it. The point is: if you're going to slander somebody's swimming abilities, at the very least do the minimal work and figure out who the heck you're dealing with. Yea, I think even Stud, with his british backing and attraction to football would have figured out you weren't talking about Fort. But, I do have one question, you asked them to "put-up or shut-up" so, why haven't you gonna ahead to put your times up? The times were linked. There was no need. I think that if you are going to make a challenge to someone, then why not put your's out there first. Be proud of your times. If you are faster...great...if not...great too. It wasn't about being fast, faster, slower or anything. I find that attitude counter-productive to the general good will that defines masters swimming and masters athletics overall. It's calling out geek and stud for dissing a fellow swimmer for the sake of an Innernets fight.