Just curious,
If a person can swim a 10 x 100 meter free set on the 1:35, would you condier that to be slow, medium, fast? Where would that person be in your workout group? Medium, Medium fast lane?
That's swum with no fins, no pull buoy.
Wiht so many swimmers coming in with so many diverse backgrounds of training, competition, success, it will be interesting to see the interpretations.
Thanks,
Rob
Former Member
When you have a tighter interval, you tend to get into a tunnel vision sort of rhythm and once your get to 8, it is all downhill.
Mind games.
For me, on a set of ten, downhill starts at six, saving somthing for number ten, always trying to make it the fastest.
The all out puke sets I read here aren't my cup of tea. However, I am pretty sure that is an effective way to swim faster. I just don't enjoy that type of exercise.
I have dim memories in my AAU days of doing 20-30 100s on a daily basis but cannot recall the interval. I just remember I was young and dumb and did them without asking why. They really hurt and seemed endless.
I confess that I am an idiot when we start mixing intervals within a set i.e. drop 5 seconds every 100. Let's just say you do not want me to be leading the lane. We did that a few weeks ago and started at 2:00 and did a few and I thought it was pretty easy. Sure enough, we somehow stuck at 1:50 for the rest of them. The faster lane had the same problem. We were all laughing about it and joked about how age can affect your brain.
All I know is if I can make 10 100s LCM on the 1:25, I will feel a sense of accomplishment. (A year ago, I could barely make 4 100s LCM on the 1:50 and literally beached myself on the deck in agony) Perhaps it will mean nothing, but I would like to be able to do that when I turn 50 next April.
Just something to shoot for......
Rob
2 definitions:
What WAS fast
and
What IS NOW fast
What WAS fast was 20-30 x 100 on :60, or 10 x 100 on :55 SCY. Something like that back in the day.
What IS NOW fast....any 100's on 1:20 or under! Kinda sad!
A fast set is relative only to the speed of the swimmer. What is a fast set for you will not be the same as what is fast for me. We can only swim within our capabilities.
What was fast for me when I was kinda fast has no bearing on today.
2 definitions:
What WAS fast
and
What IS NOW fast
What WAS fast was 20-30 x 100 on :60, or 10 x 100 on :55 SCY. Something like that back in the day.
What IS NOW fast....any 100's on 1:20 or under! Kinda sad!
The fastest you'd ever see people swimming on our team would be 10 x 100 LCM @ 1:20. It's not a kind of set we do very often. Depending on the focus of the set, you'd probably see us doing 10 x 100 LCM @ 1:25, trying to hold sub 1:15, or 10 @ 1:30, trying to hold even faster. 10 @ 1:20 would be probably 1:15's at the beginning, and turning into touch-and-go before too long.
Remember... while yes, I'd call that a "fast set", it is by no means a "sprint set". If you're a sprinter, that's a deadly set. It's an aerobic threshold set that distance swimmers will do better at.
The sprint set version would be 10 x 100 @ 2:00-or-so, holding 1:10.
-Rick
I am afraid that I am now a leisurely swimmer who now watches the clock not to do a fast set but swim it not too fast. My sets are now designed so I can finish a set in comfort.