Now are you saying it is a good thing for him to do?
I just think it's funny that you are defending his right to look while condemning him for "touching". As if the magical act of "touching" makes any difference in the morality of the situation? Curious distinction.
Now are you saying it is a good thing for him to do?
I just think it's funny that you are defending his right to look while condemning him for "touching". As if the magical act of "touching" makes any difference in the morality of the situation? Curious distinction.