So? She'll do more training as she won't be sleeping anyway, and the water will help her cool her hot flashes. I see his as a win-win.
Spoken like a true man! Just wait till it's Ms. Stud's turn.
Hmmm ..... Babies, hormones up. Menopause, hormones down. I don't see 9 hours of interrupted sleep in her future ...
:rofl:
41 now? 45 in 4 years?
Menopause!
:eek:
So? She'll do more training as she won't be sleeping anyway, and the water will help her cool her hot flashes. I see his as a win-win.
:drink:
She put on a spectacualr performance at the games these past weeks. To bad one of those medals could not have been gold, especially the relay, but silver isn't all bad.
Her ability to perform in 2012 is probably 50% her ability to maintain the level of conditioning she has and 50% what the rest of the field does.
As impressive as I find a 41 y/o getting silver in the olympics to be, I am not certain what it really says about the rest of the US womens team - and other up and coming young swimmers. This might sound bad, but there is no logical reason why the younger swimmers can not swim faster. No doubt Torres is re-writing the history books and the way we look at athletic competition in general, but if there are not at least 5-10 women beating her by 2012 I think that speaks poorly of the future of USA women's swimming.
I agree - if the USA doesn't have a bunch of under 30s that can beat Dara then USA swimming has a problem. Assuming that Dara's performance is clean (and I see no reason not to believe it) some of the younger USA swimmers could take a fresh look at their training and spend the next four years doing something new.
