I realize this thread will create a lot of controversy.
Over the past five years I have worked very hard to develop clubs and increase membership in USMS. The very fabric of my work and others in this area is building relationships and comradairre within the LMSC and or Club. Small clubs and large teams are proud of their "elite" swimmers and boast of their successes. With this said, it is very disturbing to me as I read through the FINA World Championships Physch Sheets to see the number of elite swimmers "jumping ship" to other clubs to swim on "elite" relays. If USMS had "Team USMS" I would have no problem with everyone coming together for a team effort. I don't have a problem with four guys coming together who swam in college using the Worlds as reunion of sorts. Where I have problem is the swimmer or swimmers who have been a member of a club or LMSC for years and because of individual egos leaves his team. What this says to me is our "elite" swimmers ego is more important than his or her club. How do you think the other 3 swimmers who normally swims on the relay with the "elite" swimmer feels. We are good enough througout the year, however we are not good enough for the Worlds. Instead of swimming for his or her club so all members of the club can be proud of the "elite" swimmers accomplishments, it is more important to this swimmer he or she represent someone else at the Worlds for personal gratification. If the relay team does win and breaks a WR the record does not show USMS as the record holder, but the name of a club the swimmer transferred too.... what a shame...
It is regretable I bring up this discussion, but it tears at the very fabric of the USMS mission regarding building club or LMSC relationships...I realize what these swimmers are doing is within the rules.. I just think it is wrong.
Mel
Vladimir:
Michael's seed time is 1:56 and I think Rich's record is 1:54.38 so he probably has a chance. I see that you and him are seeded 1st and 2nd in the 100 Free in the 35-39 age group and that looks like it will be an exciting race. Michael goes by Let Race on these forums and maybe he can come on here and tell us how his training is going. I have a video of him swimming a 50 Back in the 200 Medley Relay, swimming it completely underwater at the 1989 NCAA Championships. Back in those days there was no rule for getting to the surface at 15 meters. His team, the Princeton Tigers of the Ivy League won that relay 2 years in a row. I will provide a link of a discussion about him on this forum and as you can see we talk about everything here.
forums.usms.org/showthread.php
Vladimir:
Michael's seed time is 1:56 and I think Rich's record is 1:54.38 so he probably has a chance. I see that you and him are seeded 1st and 2nd in the 100 Free in the 35-39 age group and that looks like it will be an exciting race. Michael goes by Let Race on these forums and maybe he can come on here and tell us how his training is going. I have a video of him swimming a 50 Back in the 200 Medley Relay, swimming it completely underwater at the 1989 NCAA Championships. Back in those days there was no rule for getting to the surface at 15 meters. His team, the Princeton Tigers of the Ivy League won that relay 2 years in a row. I will provide a link of a discussion about him on this forum and as you can see we talk about everything here.
forums.usms.org/showthread.php
