I entered the 200 IM at the 2005 Short Course American Championships in Austin
64.233.179.104/search
be sure you cheer for the 41 year old guy racing all the whipper snappers
here's where you can look at the psyche sheet
www.utexas.edu/.../HostedMeets.htm
here's where you can follow the results:
www.tsc.utexas.edu/.../2005ASCC.html
Originally posted by newmastersswimmer
5 or 6 seconds which means I was more like a mid 57??....Perhaps the time conversions are a little larger when the times are slower?....Meaning that a 5 second conversion is appropriate for a time under 50 seconds in meters....but a 6.5 to 7 second conversion fits better for times over a minute??
I'd say this makes sense. Since there are the same number of turns in scm and scy you could just try multiplying by the meters to yards conversion factor. This would give 58.0 (63.49 * .9144). Of course, since you're swimming about 9% in further you need to consider that you'll go a little slower due to the additional distance. So this is the reason you add a little less per 100 for faster times.
Originally posted by newmastersswimmer
5 or 6 seconds which means I was more like a mid 57??....Perhaps the time conversions are a little larger when the times are slower?....Meaning that a 5 second conversion is appropriate for a time under 50 seconds in meters....but a 6.5 to 7 second conversion fits better for times over a minute??
I'd say this makes sense. Since there are the same number of turns in scm and scy you could just try multiplying by the meters to yards conversion factor. This would give 58.0 (63.49 * .9144). Of course, since you're swimming about 9% in further you need to consider that you'll go a little slower due to the additional distance. So this is the reason you add a little less per 100 for faster times.