IThe forums have been a bit drab since our friend was kicked off. We need to spice things up. Here are some possible topics:
What should US swimming do more to promote the sport?
Should the qualifying times for nationals (masters) be lowered to make the meet smaller and more conducive to fast swimming?
400 IM - the true measure of swimming ability?
Has Bush exaggerated the threat of terrorism so that he can push his social agenda in the name of national security?
My answers: Yes, Yes, Yes, and Yes
Parents
Former Member
Originally posted by Jc2000
However, one political/swimming question does come to mind. Would the US be better off if we had a dedicated lap-swimmer President? I'd like to think so--and it would certainly help get more people interested in swimming.
According to Newsweek, there is a dedicated swimmer running this year -- Wesley Clark. Since Gen. Clark seems to be a front runner, as of now, there's a possibility we may get "swimmer president."
Just for information and not necessarily an endorsement (so that this post isn't considered to be too overtly "political" :p).
Originally posted by Jc2000
However, one political/swimming question does come to mind. Would the US be better off if we had a dedicated lap-swimmer President? I'd like to think so--and it would certainly help get more people interested in swimming.
According to Newsweek, there is a dedicated swimmer running this year -- Wesley Clark. Since Gen. Clark seems to be a front runner, as of now, there's a possibility we may get "swimmer president."
Just for information and not necessarily an endorsement (so that this post isn't considered to be too overtly "political" :p).
