• Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 13 subscribers
  • Views 241 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

USMS: Glutton for punishment or social warriors?

Kurt Dickson

FYI

It is my understanding Angie is facing a tribunal in April to decide whether she is banned from USMS as apparently standing up for your rights and fairness ain't cool.  Why USMS wants this smoke baffles the mind.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/f6gOv3dC_HQ

https://state-of-swimming.ghost.io/u-s-masters-on-watch-after-swimmer-threatened-with-lifetime-ban-for-rules-protecting-womens-category/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQsJmNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFpcm03eXZEOXhUZ3YyR0djc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHgZykROwi-KyYFvSraXT0q_SsRG29TW6knjjEuUPU1pGWlT67kFyke8K3GU1_aem_dDrBWf6CXCn8pshnc_f4UA

https://iconswomen.com/stand-with-angie-griffin-save-masters-swimming/?ref=state-of-swimming.ghost.io

Parents

  • Would love to know where your understanding is coming from apart from these links you posted. 

    I'm happy to clarify  that all that this is is that an internal grievance was filed against her for unsportsmanlike behavior. No courts involved, no law suits. An internal grievance. So yeah, both sides are apparently standing up for fairness because unsportsmanlike behavior is not cool.

    And I hope a grievance like that would be filed against any member who is breaking USMS code of conduct. 

  • in reply to Britt03

    I have zero understanding and so if Angie physically assaulted someone or did something equally egregious, punish her. Otherwise, it appears to us uneducated masses as retribution. If it was words, she should have never been required to defend herself in the first place.

Reply Children
No Data