I would think more as the age moves up & there are less in each older age bracket.:2cents:
Thank you and Jeff Roddin for your responses.
I was showing how the qualification times in the 200 are harder relative to the 100 across multiple age groups (used 3 age group examples).
Jeff's point is for those who post times that the percentage of qualifiers will be about the same between the 100 and 200. This is true, but I contend that a 1:35.88 (100 *** 60+ time) is equivalent to a 3:33-34 for the 200 not 3:27.79. This may discourage seniors from doing the 200 as opposed to the 100 and 50. Anyway - I hope I haven't put you to:bed:
I would think more as the age moves up & there are less in each older age bracket.:2cents:
Thank you and Jeff Roddin for your responses.
I was showing how the qualification times in the 200 are harder relative to the 100 across multiple age groups (used 3 age group examples).
Jeff's point is for those who post times that the percentage of qualifiers will be about the same between the 100 and 200. This is true, but I contend that a 1:35.88 (100 *** 60+ time) is equivalent to a 3:33-34 for the 200 not 3:27.79. This may discourage seniors from doing the 200 as opposed to the 100 and 50. Anyway - I hope I haven't put you to:bed:
