Updates on the Spring Nationals Eligibility Review - Main Thread

USMS is monitoring media reports, comments on these forums, and responding to member inquiries on the allegations regarding the eligibility of one of our members. We felt it might be helpful to provide updates in one place and this thread will serve that purpose.

Over the past week, USMS has received several formal eligibility review requests. In keeping with our published policy, the eligibility review panel was convened late last week to gather and assess the facts. Those with standing who have requested an eligibility review have been notified and will receive updates directly from the panel as appropriate. The panel will make a final determination based on the evidence presented. Speculation or commentary outside the review will not be part of the decision.

Many members have contacted us with questions and suggestions about our transgender eligibility policy. After the eligibility review is complete, USMS leadership and relevant committees will take time to reflect on member input and other details that emerge from the process to determine whether updates to the policy are appropriate and in line with USMS’s mission and values.

We ask for your patience as this process continues, and we thank you for being part of a community that values thoughtful and respectful dialogue, integrity, and the shared love of swimming. (5/9/2025)

  • USMS is a democratic organization managed mostly by volunteers. Our competitive rules have included conditions on which trans women can compete in the "women" category for more than 20 years. If you are a USMS member and you think those rules should change, you should study the issue and collaborate with other like-minded people to propose appropriate rule changes for the membership's consideration at an Annual Meeting. Abusing our staff members and our volunteers is very unlikely to help your cause, however.

    Meanwhile, the volunteers reviewing the eligibility protests relating to 2025 SCY Nationals will finish their work carefully and respectfully, but not immediately. 

  • U.S. Masters Swimming’s Board of Directors and Rules Committee have initiated a review of USMS's transgender swimmer policy, which addresses the eligibility of transgender athletes to earn official times and other forms of recognition (places, records, and Top 10 rankings) at USMS events. USMS remains committed to ensuring members of all backgrounds feel welcome in our programs, while also recognizing the importance of fair competition in our events.

    USMS will proceed thoughtfully and respectfully in evaluating the policy and will incorporate input received from members, applicable World Aquatics policies, and the various and rapidly changing state and local regulations that make creating a national policy complex.

    The final policy will be communicated to members.

    Furthermore, USMS is addressing two other related issues:

    • USMS has received requests to confirm the eligibility of two swimmers who competed at the 2025 Spring National Championship. The established review process is underway.
    • USMS has received a letter from the Texas Attorney General’s Office requesting documentation related to the 2025 Spring National Championship in San Antonio and is cooperating with the Texas Attorney General’s Office to respond accordingly.

    We appreciate your patience and engagement as USMS works through these matters with care.

    Sincerely,

    Dawson Hughes, CEO of U.S. Masters Swimming, and Ed Coates, President of U.S. Masters Swimming (6/3/25)

  • I appreciate the updates and executive information shared on this forum; however, your audience here is limited to those who have taken time to engage in the process of enacting change. In reality, the whole body of Masters Swimming needs to hear and see these updates. I suggest that this historic moment in time demands transparent leadership via communication to all USMS members using your various platforms: email, Facebook and other social media. Publish the above letter to all members. 

    Leadership should also step up and immediately remove the arbitrary limitations on who has standing to request an eligibility review of known transgender swimmers. The current guidelines hamstring those who prioritize fairness for all.  Leadership has a choice: continue to allow the concerns of your members to be dismissed, or remove the barriers that discriminate against those seeking to ensure a fair playing field.  

  • Will USMS take into account those transgender individuals who received timely gender-affirming healthcare, including puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy, and thus went through puberty in conformity with their gender identity? They would not have a physical advantage over cisgender competitors.

    And will USMS take into account those transgender swimmers who are stealth (meaning, not out)? No one should be forced to out themselves. Now that more and more transgender individuals and children are receiving timely gender-affirming healthcare, in the future we increasingly will not be able to tell whether someone is transgender. They will "pass," and be perceived by others, as their gender identity.

    USMS, please do not enact policies that would "out" or "other" transgender swimmers. As a cisgender woman who has loved ones and friends that are transgender, I want them included and welcomed. I do not want them excluded, disqualified, discriminated against, or otherwise forced out of USMS swimming.

    USMS already has a a severe problem with its glaring lack of diversity. I am a member of another marginalized group, and I have never met another USMS swimmer that was a member of my group.

  • Moreover, the Texas Attorney General's Office has a history of engaging in unlawful, blatantly anti-trans actions and demands beyond the scope and jurisdiction of their office, such as demanding patient records from out-of-state hospitals. They have been sued multiple times on the basis of these unlawful actions and demands. I see that USMS is headquartered in Florida, not Texas.

    I strongly urge USMS to NOT comply with any unlawful demands for documentation or information from the Texas AG. Please first consult with any of the outside counsel litigating the above-mentioned lawsuits against the Texas AG, that include but are not limited to, PFLAG, ACLU (both national and Texas), Lambda Legal, as well as the law firms of Scott, Douglass & McConnico (www.scottdoug.com) and Baker Botts (www.bakerbotts.com).

  • Do you believe in dialogue? Today I discovered that 36 of 41 comments from a 4/27/2025 USMS Facebook post have been deleted, and that some of the members who contributed to the discussion have been blocked. Is this how you treat members who stray from your desired narrative? The comments were all part of an important back-and-forth on the issue of integrity in women's sports. Screen shots prove that nothing offensive was said, yet poof! the comments have now disappeared. Wow. Very disappointing that USMS suppresses free speech.