Testosterone and fairness

Everyone knows the commercials about “low T” and how men can retain their “vigor” but this also referring to basically a powerful PED. I am 76 and so far my testosterone is normal and I can’t be sure how I’d react if it wasn’t but a friend pointed out a world record holding swimmer who was faster in his 70s than 60s and faster at 75 than 70. My friend said this is very unlikely to be from better training. As I was close to WR times at 75 this is not an academic discussion for me . So what is fair .

Parents
  • The recent email regarding the transgender athlete policy references “USMS’s commitment to inclusion, fairness, and the integrity of competition, values that have defined our organization throughout its 55-year history.” Which begs the question, what is the organization’s policy regarding performance enhancing drugs? In point of fact, there is none. 

  • I think the stated policy is to follow World Aquatics ie PEDS are not allowed, but without testing that is de facto no policy.

    It's like "speed limit is 65, but no one is monitoring it and there are no consequences for speeding"

  • No such stated policy exists. The use of tobacco products on deck or in the locker rooms is, however, expressly prohibited (102.15).

  • Interesting 

  • practically every major sporting group has denounced the enhanced games. We anre tacitly endorsing our own enhanced games. I submit that USMS should endorse the same doping policy as US Swimming S. Further that there is a statement that competitors who set a world or national record may be tested. I think that probably an inadequate threat might at least deter some cheating

  • Several years ago, after being told that the cost of even limited drug testing would be too high, I proposed a simple statement saying that the use of performance enhancing drugs in USMS was prohibited and was rebuffed. 

  • I thought that USMS followed the World Aquatic doping rules. I guess my belief came from the USMS Lance Armstrong affair in 2013. At the time the USMS press release described the relationship that excluded Lance from competition as being derivative through FINA (World Aquatics) to United States Aquatic Sports to USMS. https://swimswam.com/usms-armstrong-is-not-eligible-to-race-in-usms-competitions/  I guess that just dealt with his exclusion from competition in sports within the WADA umbrella and not the adoption of WADA regulations by USMS.

    With the advent of supporters for  the "Enhanced Games"  https://www.enhanced.com/series-b the tide may shift about the adoption of doping regulations - in the US at least. What could go wrong with that...

  • "Our mission, dating back to the 60s, is we encourage adults to swim," Rob Butcher, executive director of Masters Swimming told the Associated Press. "Lance is a member of USMS so he is eligible to swim."

    USMS is unwilling to address the use of performance enhancing drugs because the organization believes that would reduce participation.  

Reply
  • "Our mission, dating back to the 60s, is we encourage adults to swim," Rob Butcher, executive director of Masters Swimming told the Associated Press. "Lance is a member of USMS so he is eligible to swim."

    USMS is unwilling to address the use of performance enhancing drugs because the organization believes that would reduce participation.  

Children
No Data