coachsci.sdsu.edu/.../ultra40a.pdf
There is a method, which is referred to as the Rushall method which Michael Andrew uses.
Was wondering if you had any critique about this. If this sort of training is a good idea and what are the problems.
Would this also be good for longer events? Like the 400 IM?
Thanks!
does anybody else read this and go.....BORING....omg BORING!!!!!
the same workout several times in the same week, week after week after week. ug, stick a fork in my eye that is so boring. i'd retire again by the 3rd week that sounds so boring.
do you have to eat the same breakfast, lunch and dinner too? everyday to go along with this completely bored to tears workout.
steve - i'm just not drinking the koolaid
I guess boring is relative. I figure in over 30 years of masters swimming I have done 6,000 + workouts. I can't think of one that I would have called boring. Some were better than others for a variety of reasons, but never ever boring!
No matter if you are doing USRPT, HIT or tons of yardage workouts, to me it has always been about the clock, and that challenge can never, to me, be a bore.
does anybody else read this and go.....BORING....omg BORING!!!!!
the same workout several times in the same week, week after week after week. ug, stick a fork in my eye that is so boring. i'd retire again by the 3rd week that sounds so boring.
do you have to eat the same breakfast, lunch and dinner too? everyday to go along with this completely bored to tears workout.
steve - i'm just not drinking the koolaid
I guess boring is relative. I figure in over 30 years of masters swimming I have done 6,000 + workouts. I can't think of one that I would have called boring. Some were better than others for a variety of reasons, but never ever boring!
No matter if you are doing USRPT, HIT or tons of yardage workouts, to me it has always been about the clock, and that challenge can never, to me, be a bore.
