coachsci.sdsu.edu/.../ultra40a.pdf
There is a method, which is referred to as the Rushall method which Michael Andrew uses.
Was wondering if you had any critique about this. If this sort of training is a good idea and what are the problems.
Would this also be good for longer events? Like the 400 IM?
Thanks!
Parents
Former Member
I'm guessing you don't attribute pacing into this training? Like what about people who don't even split? Do we just do this training with the ideal times divided by 4 and that'll build the base and we just execute pacing in the actual race?
One giant gain from this type of training: The feeling of being prepared. You know rxactly what time you're capable of doing, it feels like you truly have complete control over your times.
I'm guessing you don't attribute pacing into this training? Like what about people who don't even split? Do we just do this training with the ideal times divided by 4 and that'll build the base and we just execute pacing in the actual race?
One giant gain from this type of training: The feeling of being prepared. You know rxactly what time you're capable of doing, it feels like you truly have complete control over your times.
