coachsci.sdsu.edu/.../ultra40a.pdf
There is a method, which is referred to as the Rushall method which Michael Andrew uses.
Was wondering if you had any critique about this. If this sort of training is a good idea and what are the problems.
Would this also be good for longer events? Like the 400 IM?
Thanks!
Parents
Former Member
Yes, there was a variation for 50 pace. I think it was 4 sets of 6x12.5, without rereading the paper...
Sorry I have to quotes things to respond on my iPad so I randomly quoted that.
My question is Rushall's training method be superior to traditional training methods?
Also Dryland training has no benefit on performance according to this?
Reply
Former Member
Yes, there was a variation for 50 pace. I think it was 4 sets of 6x12.5, without rereading the paper...
Sorry I have to quotes things to respond on my iPad so I randomly quoted that.
My question is Rushall's training method be superior to traditional training methods?
Also Dryland training has no benefit on performance according to this?
