Ultra Short Training At Race Pace

Former Member
Former Member
coachsci.sdsu.edu/.../ultra40a.pdf There is a method, which is referred to as the Rushall method which Michael Andrew uses. Was wondering if you had any critique about this. If this sort of training is a good idea and what are the problems. Would this also be good for longer events? Like the 400 IM? Thanks!
Parents
  • If you want your final race time to be around, let's say, 59 sec, then each 25 repeat within your race pace training set needs to be completed in 14.75 sec.; that's when your hand needs to hit the wall. Then you can add 10-20 sec rest after each repeat, but Rushall is a big proponent of rest not exceeding exertion. So, in your case, you'd do the 14.75 sec fast 25 and then rest at wall or float for another 10-14 sec. This would make for a slightly odd interval (leave at the 24.75, for example) for clock watching, unless you have a pretty darn precise digital clock. You may have to do them more like on the :25 - that would make it 14.75 exertion and about 10.25 sec rest. The idea would be to do as many repeats hitting the wall at 14.75 as possible before failure - knowing you WILL and SHOULD fail. This may be a little trial and error in the beginning; like trying 30 repeats on the aforementioned interval and seeing how far you can get. If you can complete all 30, then you need to speed up the exertion/repeat interval. Keep track of how you do so you can document improvements and make adjustments. Make sense?
Reply
  • If you want your final race time to be around, let's say, 59 sec, then each 25 repeat within your race pace training set needs to be completed in 14.75 sec.; that's when your hand needs to hit the wall. Then you can add 10-20 sec rest after each repeat, but Rushall is a big proponent of rest not exceeding exertion. So, in your case, you'd do the 14.75 sec fast 25 and then rest at wall or float for another 10-14 sec. This would make for a slightly odd interval (leave at the 24.75, for example) for clock watching, unless you have a pretty darn precise digital clock. You may have to do them more like on the :25 - that would make it 14.75 exertion and about 10.25 sec rest. The idea would be to do as many repeats hitting the wall at 14.75 as possible before failure - knowing you WILL and SHOULD fail. This may be a little trial and error in the beginning; like trying 30 repeats on the aforementioned interval and seeing how far you can get. If you can complete all 30, then you need to speed up the exertion/repeat interval. Keep track of how you do so you can document improvements and make adjustments. Make sense?
Children
No Data