Too much Skin

Former Member
Former Member
Went to the Missouri Grand Prix, w my wife and girls, age 12 and 8, to watch some great swimming this past weekend and it was great! Also recently paid to have a criminal background check as I am an official for USA swimming, so they can make sure I'm not a perv...(I passed...) I will say this, and I'm really not a prude, but in light of spending 55-60 bucks for the background check, perhaps USA swimming should look at enforcing some simple modesty in the swimmers. I've never seen so many butt-cracks on the men and butt cheeks on the women in my entire lifelong swimming experience!!!! The fronts of guys suits literally an inch from their "junk" and their butt crack hanging out. Girls with their full butt cheek exposed as their warmup suits were 5 sizes too small and tucked in like a thong. My 8 yr old daughter and my wife had a 20 something young man wrap his towel around himself, pull off his suit, pull on his underwear, about 5 ft in front of them (and his butt was fully exposed for a brief moment)... I personally dont care, it bothers me not in the least, but what does bother me is USA is trying to crack down on the pervs, but then allows this... Just my 2 cents...
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    What the Hell is the big deal about swimmers showing "too much" skin? For over 60 years, swimming has been an almost bare body activity that involved only a minimum amount of clothing (-IE- briefs for guys or bikinis and tops for gals). As long as they're not stripping totally naked on the deck, I've got no problem. While we're on the subject, the same bunch of prudes that are preaching guys shouldn't wear conventional speedos because they are some how immodest (show too much of the upper leg and purportedly accentuate the male anatomy) now want guys to wear jammers (or tech suits) -both of which create that absolutely awful looking "Bulge" in the groin area!!! What a bunch of hypocrites!!! :bump: D2
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    What the Hell is the big deal about swimmers showing "too much" skin? For over 60 years, swimming has been an almost bare body activity that involved only a minimum amount of clothing (-IE- briefs for guys or bikinis and tops for gals). As long as they're not stripping totally naked on the deck, I've got no problem. While we're on the subject, the same bunch of prudes that are preaching guys shouldn't wear conventional speedos because they are some how immodest (show too much of the upper leg and purportedly accentuate the male anatomy) now want guys to wear jammers (or tech suits) -both of which create that absolutely awful looking "Bulge" in the groin area!!! What a bunch of hypocrites!!! :bump: D2
Children
No Data