I think it was Ande that said "it's not how fast you swim, it's how fast you slow down." I read that a few years ago and keep on coming back to it as I have watched my kids grow in their USA Swimming careers. When kids are around 8-10, many of the races are 50s. Lots of kids can swim relatively fast 50s compared to other kids even when their stroke technique is truly awful. But then once the clock strikes 11 (years old), all of the 50s go away (less one) - and magically many of the kids with bad technique who seemed fast start losing to kids in the 100s and 200s with superior strokes. My question is at what age are we masters swimmers when we start thinking 50 backstroke, 50 butterfly and 50 breaststroke are OK to race again? It is not OK. It brings our sport down to a level where people who train only 100s or less and focus on 25s are taking over our pools. No more I say!!! I think USMS rules should only allow these races for people in their 70s and older. Who is with me?!!!
:worms: :bolt:
Parents
Former Member
I agree. I briefly forgot that this is a USMS swimming forum. In the elite world however, I still feel that distance swimmers are quite able to be to more sucessful in sprints than sprinters are sucessful in distance events.
IMers might even take the cake from all of them.
That is my very biased opinion which is not supported by any facts or inkling of research.
I agree. I briefly forgot that this is a USMS swimming forum. In the elite world however, I still feel that distance swimmers are quite able to be to more sucessful in sprints than sprinters are sucessful in distance events.
IMers might even take the cake from all of them.
That is my very biased opinion which is not supported by any facts or inkling of research.
