On 12 June 2010 SE suggested that we investigae our SDI:
Your aerobic/anaerobic balance =
Log(T1/T2) / Log(D1/D2)
I replied:
SE:
OK, so I did this several ways:
100/200 back = 1.12
50/200 back = 1.10
50/100 back = 1.08
Yesterday I recomputed:
100/200 back = 1.21
50/200 back = 1.39
50/100 back = 1.14
Since I last posted, I have improved my time in all three bk events; 50, 100 & 200. The changes in SDI suggest that my anerobic ability has improved relative to my aerobic ability. This is rather surprising to me. While I have been attempting to do more race-pace work in practice, my workouts still contain a lot of 100s and 200s on short rest, (the stuff sprinters like Fort and chowmi won't go near). I'm wondering if what the results shown above really mean is that I haven't reached my current potential in the 200.
On 12 June 2010 SE suggested that we investigae our SDI:
Your aerobic/anaerobic balance =
Log(T1/T2) / Log(D1/D2)
I replied:
SE:
OK, so I did this several ways:
100/200 back = 1.12
50/200 back = 1.10
50/100 back = 1.08
Yesterday I recomputed:
100/200 back = 1.21
50/200 back = 1.39
50/100 back = 1.14
Since I last posted, I have improved my time in all three bk events; 50, 100 & 200. The changes in SDI suggest that my anerobic ability has improved relative to my aerobic ability. This is rather surprising to me. While I have been attempting to do more race-pace work in practice, my workouts still contain a lot of 100s and 200s on short rest, (the stuff sprinters like Fort and chowmi won't go near). I'm wondering if what the results shown above really mean is that I haven't reached my current potential in the 200.
