I'll dispute the claim of "massive" peer review. Banister's 1990 article (probably the most cited) has only 79 citations, not many of which can be interpreted as validating the model. Would you happen to know of any other similar training specific proposal topic having been exposed to heat more than this one? I may be wrong of course.
I'll ask James Carter, one of Banister collaborator and friends over the course of Trimp development. He should be able to clarify. Sorry if I mislead you.
Not that I have a problem with the validity of the dose-response model. I think it's good and I use it myself. The question of interest in this thread is whether it works for sprints. As far as I am concerned, I don't think that Trimp suits sprinters needs better than a power based or even an RPE based impulse-response model, for the reason mentioned earlier. HR response it way too slow to react to short and intense bouts.
Find me any study where any of these dose-response models have been validated for any event lasting less than a minute (in any sport). If it exists, I'd be very interested to read it. You may want to address such a question on the google wattage group. You'll probably get an answer within 48 hours.
Specify that you're interested in Coggan's TSS model. The Father himself will probably answer it. In fact, I will ask the question on this group immediately and report back.
** edit **
Done! My nick there, as well as on all sports related forums is SolarEnergy.
In the meantime, why don't you give this guy here, a serious look... It marks the beginning. The first big step.
www.midweekclub.ca/articles/coggan.pdf
I'll dispute the claim of "massive" peer review. Banister's 1990 article (probably the most cited) has only 79 citations, not many of which can be interpreted as validating the model. Would you happen to know of any other similar training specific proposal topic having been exposed to heat more than this one? I may be wrong of course.
I'll ask James Carter, one of Banister collaborator and friends over the course of Trimp development. He should be able to clarify. Sorry if I mislead you.
Not that I have a problem with the validity of the dose-response model. I think it's good and I use it myself. The question of interest in this thread is whether it works for sprints. As far as I am concerned, I don't think that Trimp suits sprinters needs better than a power based or even an RPE based impulse-response model, for the reason mentioned earlier. HR response it way too slow to react to short and intense bouts.
Find me any study where any of these dose-response models have been validated for any event lasting less than a minute (in any sport). If it exists, I'd be very interested to read it. You may want to address such a question on the google wattage group. You'll probably get an answer within 48 hours.
Specify that you're interested in Coggan's TSS model. The Father himself will probably answer it. In fact, I will ask the question on this group immediately and report back.
** edit **
Done! My nick there, as well as on all sports related forums is SolarEnergy.
In the meantime, why don't you give this guy here, a serious look... It marks the beginning. The first big step.
www.midweekclub.ca/articles/coggan.pdf
