This concept dates back to 35 years ago, and has been submitted to *massive* pair review.
I can not think of a exercise training specific proposal that received more *heat* than Canadian Banister's TRIMP.
I'll dispute the claim of "massive" peer review. Banister's 1990 article (probably the most cited) has only 79 citations, not many of which can be interpreted as validating the model.
Not that I have a problem with the validity of the dose-response model. I think it's good and I use it myself. The question of interest in this thread is whether it works for sprints.
Find me any study where any of these dose-response models have been validated for any event lasting less than a minute (in any sport). If it exists, I'd be very interested to read it.
On the contrary, the Helgerud paper linked to earlier in this thread provides evidence that just weighting harder work by its higher intensity does NOT do a sufficient job. I.e. one variable is too few.
This concept dates back to 35 years ago, and has been submitted to *massive* pair review.
I can not think of a exercise training specific proposal that received more *heat* than Canadian Banister's TRIMP.
I'll dispute the claim of "massive" peer review. Banister's 1990 article (probably the most cited) has only 79 citations, not many of which can be interpreted as validating the model.
Not that I have a problem with the validity of the dose-response model. I think it's good and I use it myself. The question of interest in this thread is whether it works for sprints.
Find me any study where any of these dose-response models have been validated for any event lasting less than a minute (in any sport). If it exists, I'd be very interested to read it.
On the contrary, the Helgerud paper linked to earlier in this thread provides evidence that just weighting harder work by its higher intensity does NOT do a sufficient job. I.e. one variable is too few.
