Training article - For everyone!

Former Member
Former Member
I really enjoyed this article and hope you like it too. Coach T. www.pponline.co.uk/.../0952.htm
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Formula for Energy points in yards = (91.44/t)^3*t assuming 100 yard repeats. Energy points is just physics energy with a bunch of variables thrown out that become constants when looked at for an individual swimmer. Examples of the points idea, and the points idea really is an idea meant to compete with GTD not Skiba or other training models. But maybe it is valid to use in calculating base for Solar :) Here is an example of 1 workout, with variations of the main set. Assume that the workout includes 1500 yards of warm up, cool down, drill, kick, etc, that would be done on the same intervals at the same effort no matter what. So the only variable is the main set, and I am assuming the main set is going to last about 20 minutes. I am trying to make the best use of my workout time by maximizing how much energy I use during that time. All these would require the same energy, but the yardage is significantly different. Main Set option 1 (this would be typical short rest): - 15x100 on 1:20 holding 1:15s - 2039 points or 15*(91.44/75)^3*75 Main Set option 2 (this would be 1:1 work:rest): - 10x100 on 2:00 holding 1:01s - 2055 points or 10*(91.44/61)^3*61 - 33% less volume same points Main Set option 3 (impossible) - 5x100 on 4:00 holding :43s - 2067 points or 5*(91.44/43)^3*43 - 66% decrease in volume is too much to over come by swimming faster Taking more rest to do faster work wouldn't hurt using this model in place of a GTD model. Aka, collecting points instead of yardage. The similarity of energy needs between sets 1 and 2 justifies using speed work as an acceptable alternative to typical short rest sets even if the goal is weight loss. The 3rd option is considered impossible if Main Set 1 is a typical set. Here is the look up table: Yards time Meters 305 *50* 400 293 *51* 384 282 *52* 369 272 *53* 355 262 *54* 342 252 *55* 330 243 *56* 318 235 *57* 307 227 *58* 297 219 *59* 287 212 *60* 277 205 *61* 268 198 *62* 260 192 *63* 251 186 *64* 244 180 *65* 236 175 *66* 229 170 *67* 222 165 *68* 216 160 *69* 210 156 *70* 204 151 *71* 198 147 *72* 192 143 *73* 187 139 *74* 182 135 *75* 177 132 *76* 173 128 *77* 168 125 *78* 164 122 *79* 160 119 *80* 156 116 *81* 152 113 *82* 148 110 *83* 145 108 *84* 141 105 *85* 138 103 *86* 135 101 *87* 132 98 *88* 129 96 *89* 126 94 *90* 123
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Formula for Energy points in yards = (91.44/t)^3*t assuming 100 yard repeats. Energy points is just physics energy with a bunch of variables thrown out that become constants when looked at for an individual swimmer. Examples of the points idea, and the points idea really is an idea meant to compete with GTD not Skiba or other training models. But maybe it is valid to use in calculating base for Solar :) Here is an example of 1 workout, with variations of the main set. Assume that the workout includes 1500 yards of warm up, cool down, drill, kick, etc, that would be done on the same intervals at the same effort no matter what. So the only variable is the main set, and I am assuming the main set is going to last about 20 minutes. I am trying to make the best use of my workout time by maximizing how much energy I use during that time. All these would require the same energy, but the yardage is significantly different. Main Set option 1 (this would be typical short rest): - 15x100 on 1:20 holding 1:15s - 2039 points or 15*(91.44/75)^3*75 Main Set option 2 (this would be 1:1 work:rest): - 10x100 on 2:00 holding 1:01s - 2055 points or 10*(91.44/61)^3*61 - 33% less volume same points Main Set option 3 (impossible) - 5x100 on 4:00 holding :43s - 2067 points or 5*(91.44/43)^3*43 - 66% decrease in volume is too much to over come by swimming faster Taking more rest to do faster work wouldn't hurt using this model in place of a GTD model. Aka, collecting points instead of yardage. The similarity of energy needs between sets 1 and 2 justifies using speed work as an acceptable alternative to typical short rest sets even if the goal is weight loss. The 3rd option is considered impossible if Main Set 1 is a typical set. Here is the look up table: Yards time Meters 305 *50* 400 293 *51* 384 282 *52* 369 272 *53* 355 262 *54* 342 252 *55* 330 243 *56* 318 235 *57* 307 227 *58* 297 219 *59* 287 212 *60* 277 205 *61* 268 198 *62* 260 192 *63* 251 186 *64* 244 180 *65* 236 175 *66* 229 170 *67* 222 165 *68* 216 160 *69* 210 156 *70* 204 151 *71* 198 147 *72* 192 143 *73* 187 139 *74* 182 135 *75* 177 132 *76* 173 128 *77* 168 125 *78* 164 122 *79* 160 119 *80* 156 116 *81* 152 113 *82* 148 110 *83* 145 108 *84* 141 105 *85* 138 103 *86* 135 101 *87* 132 98 *88* 129 96 *89* 126 94 *90* 123
Children
No Data