SE:
OK, so I did this several ways:
100/200 back = 1.12
50/200 back = 1.10
50/100 back = 1.08
50/100 free ≈ 1.17
50/500 free ≈ 1.09
So what does this suggest to you? First thing that strikes me related to your back events, is the relatively slow times over your 50s, which suggests a lack in term of pure speed power. Previous analysis done with Allen Stark data revealed an SDI of 1.2 between his 50breast and 100 ***, which is a little more typical (normal).
Your times supplied for the free style events seem a bit inconsistent. So it's hard to issue any comment about them. It's preferable to use two data input for performances realized 1) same course type and 2) ideally, within a relatively small time frame. Allen's data was gathered over one single weekend I believe, same for the two top level breaststrokers quoted earlier in the discussion.
SE:
OK, so I did this several ways:
100/200 back = 1.12
50/200 back = 1.10
50/100 back = 1.08
50/100 free ≈ 1.17
50/500 free ≈ 1.09
So what does this suggest to you? First thing that strikes me related to your back events, is the relatively slow times over your 50s, which suggests a lack in term of pure speed power. Previous analysis done with Allen Stark data revealed an SDI of 1.2 between his 50breast and 100 ***, which is a little more typical (normal).
Your times supplied for the free style events seem a bit inconsistent. So it's hard to issue any comment about them. It's preferable to use two data input for performances realized 1) same course type and 2) ideally, within a relatively small time frame. Allen's data was gathered over one single weekend I believe, same for the two top level breaststrokers quoted earlier in the discussion.
