This approach is very safe and conventional. You grew your work capacity up to a certain extent, then lost a bit of it in favor of more quality work. Was validated way back then by Bompa, and it still applies today in my humble opinion.
But is this what you recommend for 50s & 100s?
I don't think dryland has been "disproved;" perhaps drylands are more idiosyncratic. And that was very odd wording, indeed, Lindsay.
This approach is very safe and conventional. You grew your work capacity up to a certain extent, then lost a bit of it in favor of more quality work. Was validated way back then by Bompa, and it still applies today in my humble opinion.
But is this what you recommend for 50s & 100s?
I don't think dryland has been "disproved;" perhaps drylands are more idiosyncratic. And that was very odd wording, indeed, Lindsay.
