Regional Teams: What's the Point?

Former Member
Former Member
With the continued growth in USMS membership, I would submit that it's time to eliminate the regional teams at Nationals. Case in point: NCMS sent a "team" of 123 swimmers to Atlanta, enough to enter A, B, C, and D relays in many events (e.g. the mens 35+ 200 free relay in which our club team placed 13th behind eight regional teams). It's been argued that the formation of regional teams allows more swimmers to participate in relays, yet local clubs from North Carolina sent as many as thirty or more athletes and could have entered relays on their own as our club (with eight swimmers) did. Swim with the guys you actually train with.
Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Supposedly NCMS entered 77 relays. I thought the intent was participation, not domination. Look, we wanted to win a medal for one of our teammates who was edged out in his individual events. Silly to some, I guess. Anyway, we still had a great time, and it was pretty special swimming a relay with guys who train together every morning at 5:30. Interestingly, one of my teammates was an age group swimmer when I was in college, and we were actually in the same pool with the same coach on Saturday mornings back in 1978.
Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member
    Supposedly NCMS entered 77 relays. I thought the intent was participation, not domination. Look, we wanted to win a medal for one of our teammates who was edged out in his individual events. Silly to some, I guess. Anyway, we still had a great time, and it was pretty special swimming a relay with guys who train together every morning at 5:30. Interestingly, one of my teammates was an age group swimmer when I was in college, and we were actually in the same pool with the same coach on Saturday mornings back in 1978.
Children
No Data