The IM Lane

IMers, We're Jacks & Jills of all trades Fly back *** free We gotta have speed but we gotta last to finish fast. It takes strategy & conditioning. We train equal amounts of all 4 or have a fatal flaw. We try to make our worst stroke not so bad. It's worked well for Ryan Michael Eric, Ariana Kirsty & Stephony What did you do in practice today? the breastroke lane The Middle Distance Lane The Backstroke Lane The Butterfly Lane The SDK Lane The Taper Lane The Distance Lane The IM Lane The Sprint Free Lane The Pool Deck
Parents
  • I've a question for the experienced 400 IMers. In prearing for the 200 bk (and and very recently also the 200 br) I have found that swimming sets of 4x50 with about 8-10s between the 50s is a valuable training tool. It allows me to practice at or near race pace, yet the rest is sufficiently brief that it "feels like" a full 200, as opposed to swimming shorter distances on longer intervals. I also find that the add-up time for a strong effort on (4x50 with 8-10s rest) is a pretty good indicator of what I can expect for a full 200 in a race. I'm looking for a similar training tool for the 400 IM. For 4x100 IMO with N seconds rest between 100s, what value of N gives an add-up close to race time? Is this even a reasonable approach? It removes all of the change-stroke turns. Would it would be better to break at 50, 150 and 350? That seems cumbersome.You're trying to get in the range of your actual 200 back time (minus rest) with that set, and are attempting to design the same kind of set for the 400IM? I'm not an IM'er, but if this is so and you want to keep the transitions, maybe reps of 400IMs- break at the 50, and every 100 after that for 5-10sec? That would be of the same design as your 200 back set.
Reply
  • I've a question for the experienced 400 IMers. In prearing for the 200 bk (and and very recently also the 200 br) I have found that swimming sets of 4x50 with about 8-10s between the 50s is a valuable training tool. It allows me to practice at or near race pace, yet the rest is sufficiently brief that it "feels like" a full 200, as opposed to swimming shorter distances on longer intervals. I also find that the add-up time for a strong effort on (4x50 with 8-10s rest) is a pretty good indicator of what I can expect for a full 200 in a race. I'm looking for a similar training tool for the 400 IM. For 4x100 IMO with N seconds rest between 100s, what value of N gives an add-up close to race time? Is this even a reasonable approach? It removes all of the change-stroke turns. Would it would be better to break at 50, 150 and 350? That seems cumbersome.You're trying to get in the range of your actual 200 back time (minus rest) with that set, and are attempting to design the same kind of set for the 400IM? I'm not an IM'er, but if this is so and you want to keep the transitions, maybe reps of 400IMs- break at the 50, and every 100 after that for 5-10sec? That would be of the same design as your 200 back set.
Children
No Data