men's ncaa psych sheet 09 vs 10

Former Member
Former Member
2009 psych sheet at (click on results) collegeswimming.com/.../ 2010 psych sheet at championships.coloradotime.com/.../m10_off_ps.pdf After a quick run down there seems to be some pretty significant differences throughout. For example, here is a comparison of the 1650... 2009: 1 seed = 14:35 23 seed = 14.58 2010: 1 seed = 14:46 23 seed = 15:08
Parents
  • The number of A cuts is interesting, but I think a better measure is looking at the Meet Qualifying time for each event year-over-year. This message lacks smilies. RECTIFY! :banana::bouncing::bow::cheerleader::bump: That is a lot of work you put in, and it does support what, to a casual observer, appears to be a fairly consistent slowing of times across all of the events. I heard Gary Hall Sr. speak a few weeks ago and one of his points was that the tech suit experiment demonstrated concretely that even small changes in drag can make big differences in performance.
Reply
  • The number of A cuts is interesting, but I think a better measure is looking at the Meet Qualifying time for each event year-over-year. This message lacks smilies. RECTIFY! :banana::bouncing::bow::cheerleader::bump: That is a lot of work you put in, and it does support what, to a casual observer, appears to be a fairly consistent slowing of times across all of the events. I heard Gary Hall Sr. speak a few weeks ago and one of his points was that the tech suit experiment demonstrated concretely that even small changes in drag can make big differences in performance.
Children
No Data