2009 psych sheet at (click on results)
collegeswimming.com/.../
2010 psych sheet at
championships.coloradotime.com/.../m10_off_ps.pdf
After a quick run down there seems to be some pretty significant differences throughout. For example, here is a comparison of the 1650...
2009:
1 seed = 14:35
23 seed = 14.58
2010:
1 seed = 14:46
23 seed = 15:08
Parents
Former Member
but then if you look at the 200 IM, remove the nr 1 seed in 2009 and there is no change in the top 23.
too bad the sheets don't their yrs. it would be interesting to see how many that qualified last yr didn't this year
Ya...I did notice that some events appear to be more affected than others. A couple didn't have much difference at all. The freestyle events in particular, from sprint to distance, seem to have produced the greatest disparity.
All in all, though, I would say that the 09 psych sheet is noticeably faster. But I didn't really study it closely. I'll be interested to see how NCAAs come out. I think its going to be fast.
but then if you look at the 200 IM, remove the nr 1 seed in 2009 and there is no change in the top 23.
too bad the sheets don't their yrs. it would be interesting to see how many that qualified last yr didn't this year
Ya...I did notice that some events appear to be more affected than others. A couple didn't have much difference at all. The freestyle events in particular, from sprint to distance, seem to have produced the greatest disparity.
All in all, though, I would say that the 09 psych sheet is noticeably faster. But I didn't really study it closely. I'll be interested to see how NCAAs come out. I think its going to be fast.
