Swim smooth has an interesting pair of videos that makes the argument that minimizing strokes per length isn't the same thing as maximizing efficiency. Janet Evans and Laure Manaudou are cited as examples of swimmers with high strokes per length and a faster turnover. Elite triathletes with shorter strokes are also cited. The idea is not to advocate everyone use a shorter stroke but just to say that if a shorter stroke works for you don't throw that away in pursuit of lower strokes per length.
I wonder if swimming with a shorter stroke and higher turnover is analogous to using a lower gear when cycling (spinning versus grinding). People generally acknowledge that the optimal gear to use will vary from individual to individual. Extrapolating from that line of reasoning, perhaps elite swimmers using longer strokes do so because they have greater strength/more power that allows them to use a longer stroke/higher gear rather than because they worked on lengthening their strokes (although the two are clearly related).
YouTube- Swim Smooth: What Is An Efficient Freestyle Stroke? Part 1
YouTube- Swim Smooth: What Is An Efficient Freestyle Stroke? Part 2
If i take 14 strokes, i am super slow. I am usually at about 16. if going fast wow, 18. I am not a freestyler. for breasstroke- super slow (like practice 8). realistically more if pushing it.
I always heard, less strokes, more efficient but the people faster than me in practice take 20 or more. go figure.
worst stroke- back for me, is like 19 eek
If i take 14 strokes, i am super slow. I am usually at about 16. if going fast wow, 18. I am not a freestyler. for breasstroke- super slow (like practice 8). realistically more if pushing it.
I always heard, less strokes, more efficient but the people faster than me in practice take 20 or more. go figure.
worst stroke- back for me, is like 19 eek
