The following has appeared on a swim forum in the UK
_______________________________________________
I’ve been looking at recent masters results. It’s clear that swimmers are producing much slower times without bodysuits. Furthermore, many swimmers are disillusioned and are on the verge of giving up completely. It would be a travesty if these swimmers (they are mostly the over 45s) were lost to the sport altogether.
The majority of masters swimmers prefer to compete in bodysuits. Of that there is no doubt, as witnessed at masters meets up and down the country. It is a disgrace that masters swimmers have been included in the ‘new rules’ concerning elite swimming. I find it quite sad that many swimmers are talking about cutting up their suits, taking out zips and even asking whether they are allowed ‘modesty panels’ in their suits any more.
As always, we are getting no advice, guidance or even leadership from the toothless Masters Committee, whose gingivitic and malocclusive tendencies are attracting Big Nev’s interest, but that’s to be expected.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. Masters swimmers in Italy are not accepting this farce. They are still holding meets where swimmers can choose to wear bodysuits.
There was a recent questionnaire sent out to 4,000 masters swimmers in France. 2,700 swimmers replied, stating they wished to keep their bodysuits for competition.
Masters swimmers in Germany are on the verge of revolution! They accept that masters swimmers are not going to be a threat to any Olympian’s records. Many have now entered masters meets in Italy where they can wear their suits if they want. Also, some meet organisers in Germany are holding similar meets.
Instead of following any directive from our anaemic and tedious Masters Committee, I’d like to see masters swimmers in the UK make a stand against the stupidity surrounding the banning of bodysuits. It will cost me time and money but I’m prepared to organise this.
We need meet organisers in the UK to hold ‘optional suit’ masters meets. Swimmers can choose whether to wear a suit or not. If they are going for a record then the suitless option is a must - but only for a while. I believe that if we boycott masters meets where suits are now allowed, meet organisers, the Masters Committee and the ASA would have to take notice. At the moment they don’t give a toss. At the forefront of the ASA’s mind would be the loss of revenue. Believe me, they see masters swimming as a joke anyway, they would happily let masters swim in bodysuits if it meant they could keep the revenue pouring in.
Getting meet organisers to run ‘bodysuit’ meets would be easy. They would be oversubscribed, every time. Not only from our swimmers but from overseas entries too. I can see one-day meets turning into weekend ones. The organisers could make a lot of money from these well-attended meets. Pulling the plug on masters meets because of low entries would be a thing of the past.
These meets would be the thin end of the wedge in bringing about a change of rules. It‘s the boycotting of ‘non-suit’ meets that would bring a change of rule overnight.
The decathlon would be meaningless because ‘suited’ swims wouldn’t count towards it - but in reality, it is a meaningless competition anyway for all but ten swimmers in the UK who have a chance of winning it.
Don’t underestimate what can be done. Masters swimmers are a powerful group in swimming. The Government is putting very large amounts of money into the greasy hand of the ASA to promote health and fitness for adults. The ASA wouldn’t like the kind of publicity we can give them.
If you feel you can support this initiative I’ll make a start. Masters swimmers in Italy, France and Germany are ready to come on board. Many masters swimmers in America are also willing to make a stand against their governing body. Naturally, support from suit manufacturers is there already. I’ve spoken to four of the biggest.
But those same folks shouldn't then disparage a different decision/priority to spend money on gear for competing. Or argue our gear should be banned so they don't have to compete at a disadvantage and can continue spending their discretionary income on non-sports items.
I can only speak for myself, but I have always thought the money argument against tech suits was weak. I thought USA-S did a good thing in regulating the use of the suits for younger swimmers, which also blunted the argument that the suits were a barrier for poor kids to the sport. I was a little sympathetic to the argument that college programs might be cut because of the extra cost of the suits (I know for a fact that they could be a significant budget item for smaller swim programs).
In fact I don't believe cost was the main reason the suits were banned, though I'm not sure that FINA has really explained the rationale of its rulings in any detail.
Well I just broke down and bought a B70 thanks to the now low price. (Thanks for the heads up Ande). But I'm not sure iI can wear it. It is a M32 size:
6'1"+ (me 6'),
w33 (I wear 34 jeans but sometimes my waist looks kinda like a bear gut),
chest 41 (me 42),
weight 215+ (me 175).
Any way I need help to zip it up and all this dough looking stuff spills out where my lats are and my belly looks a snake that just ate a rat. (round bulge).
Well I just broke down and bought a B70 thanks to the now low price. (Thanks for the heads up Ande). But I'm not sure iI can wear it. It is a M32 size
I thought for sure you were going to say it was way too big. I'm not far off your size and I have a 28 that fits great!
I think if you got it zipped up and you're able to move your arms through a full range of motion you'll be fine.
Thanks Knelson;
Yeah full range of motion. Just kinda worried that I'll look foolish. Once in the water I won't care. Maybe I just expected that I'd look like an age 22 elite swimmer in the suit....
Well I just broke down and bought a B70 thanks to the now low price. (Thanks for the heads up Ande). But I'm not sure iI can wear it. It is a M32 size:
6'1"+ (me 6'),
w33 (I wear 34 jeans but sometimes my waist looks kinda like a bear gut),
chest 41 (me 42),
weight 215+ (me 175).
Any way I need help to zip it up and all this dough looking stuff spills out where my lats are and my belly looks a snake that just ate a rat. (round bulge).
This should be fine. The B70 fabric is very conforming. I wear the size 32, but I'm taller (6'4" and 190lbs). It definitely does accentuate the bulges, unfortunately, but it feels great in the water.
Yep, I'm going to wear it for warm up.
I don't want to "pull a Phelps" and swim thru the deck to the parking lot!The first time I wore one, I swam my normal warmup in a drag suit, then dried off and slipped the B70 on for about 100. It felt fabulous. By now, I prefer to race with a dry suit, if at all possible.
Think I'm better off moving out of Dixie Zone.
Yes, they were rather bad last year. I'm only attending Nationals in the Dixie Zone this year as a result, and will stick close to PV where we are very fortunate to have an extremely conscientious TT guru and meet directors. :bow:
I think Geek stole my car.
Oh, and I agree with Chris on the cost issue -- it's largely a red herring, though I have no objection to kids (not adults or elites) being regulated.
Since the subject of tech suits seems to just grind on and on, has anyone ever noted that the increase in speed contributed by using one of these suits not really that significant?
Proponents of tech suits have even claimed that they make the sport more attractive to the TV viewing audience because they want to watch people swim faster.
However the minor increase in speed because of tech suits is a lot like making snail racing faster– You’re not going to see much of a difference. :confused:
D2
http://www.snailracing.net/
YouTube- Snail race