The following has appeared on a swim forum in the UK
_______________________________________________
I’ve been looking at recent masters results. It’s clear that swimmers are producing much slower times without bodysuits. Furthermore, many swimmers are disillusioned and are on the verge of giving up completely. It would be a travesty if these swimmers (they are mostly the over 45s) were lost to the sport altogether.
The majority of masters swimmers prefer to compete in bodysuits. Of that there is no doubt, as witnessed at masters meets up and down the country. It is a disgrace that masters swimmers have been included in the ‘new rules’ concerning elite swimming. I find it quite sad that many swimmers are talking about cutting up their suits, taking out zips and even asking whether they are allowed ‘modesty panels’ in their suits any more.
As always, we are getting no advice, guidance or even leadership from the toothless Masters Committee, whose gingivitic and malocclusive tendencies are attracting Big Nev’s interest, but that’s to be expected.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. Masters swimmers in Italy are not accepting this farce. They are still holding meets where swimmers can choose to wear bodysuits.
There was a recent questionnaire sent out to 4,000 masters swimmers in France. 2,700 swimmers replied, stating they wished to keep their bodysuits for competition.
Masters swimmers in Germany are on the verge of revolution! They accept that masters swimmers are not going to be a threat to any Olympian’s records. Many have now entered masters meets in Italy where they can wear their suits if they want. Also, some meet organisers in Germany are holding similar meets.
Instead of following any directive from our anaemic and tedious Masters Committee, I’d like to see masters swimmers in the UK make a stand against the stupidity surrounding the banning of bodysuits. It will cost me time and money but I’m prepared to organise this.
We need meet organisers in the UK to hold ‘optional suit’ masters meets. Swimmers can choose whether to wear a suit or not. If they are going for a record then the suitless option is a must - but only for a while. I believe that if we boycott masters meets where suits are now allowed, meet organisers, the Masters Committee and the ASA would have to take notice. At the moment they don’t give a toss. At the forefront of the ASA’s mind would be the loss of revenue. Believe me, they see masters swimming as a joke anyway, they would happily let masters swim in bodysuits if it meant they could keep the revenue pouring in.
Getting meet organisers to run ‘bodysuit’ meets would be easy. They would be oversubscribed, every time. Not only from our swimmers but from overseas entries too. I can see one-day meets turning into weekend ones. The organisers could make a lot of money from these well-attended meets. Pulling the plug on masters meets because of low entries would be a thing of the past.
These meets would be the thin end of the wedge in bringing about a change of rules. It‘s the boycotting of ‘non-suit’ meets that would bring a change of rule overnight.
The decathlon would be meaningless because ‘suited’ swims wouldn’t count towards it - but in reality, it is a meaningless competition anyway for all but ten swimmers in the UK who have a chance of winning it.
Don’t underestimate what can be done. Masters swimmers are a powerful group in swimming. The Government is putting very large amounts of money into the greasy hand of the ASA to promote health and fitness for adults. The ASA wouldn’t like the kind of publicity we can give them.
If you feel you can support this initiative I’ll make a start. Masters swimmers in Italy, France and Germany are ready to come on board. Many masters swimmers in America are also willing to make a stand against their governing body. Naturally, support from suit manufacturers is there already. I’ve spoken to four of the biggest.
Parents
Former Member
My car? 1996 Toyota Tacoma compact pickup. It's rusty, the bumper sits at a funny angle, and it's got almost 200,000 miles on it. However it runs when I turn the key and the insurance and taxes are cheap.
My tech suit? Yingfa-- $35 on eBay, and it came in an envelope festooned with pretty stamps from China. Is it faster than my practice suit? Oh hell yes. It was immediately obvious the first time I hit the water in it. Is it as fast as a $400 suit? Without a lottery win, I'll never know. But you know what? I don't care. I'm having fun, they're having fun, it's all good.
(This carries over into other sports I compete in, too. Take tennis-- there's some seriously wealthy *&%#s playing tennis, with their expensive club memberships, husbands who own airplanes, top-of-the line racquets, private lessons from a pro, expensive Adidas outfits, etc. I go out there on the tournament court in my practice shorts and tank top with my last-year's-style racquet and shoes with a hole in the toe and work my tail off to beat them, and it feels GREAT! Sure they drive home to their half-million-dollar McMansion in a 2010 BMW and I drive to a little apartment in a crappy worn-out industrial town in my trusty old pickup, but my point is that a seasoned scrounger and bargain-shopper can make do with 2nd tier equipment.)
Point is, it's not about the money. People who have less will find a way to level the playing field-- work harder, second-hand gear, bargain shopping, what have you. It's all good if it's all fun.
My car? 1996 Toyota Tacoma compact pickup. It's rusty, the bumper sits at a funny angle, and it's got almost 200,000 miles on it. However it runs when I turn the key and the insurance and taxes are cheap.
My tech suit? Yingfa-- $35 on eBay, and it came in an envelope festooned with pretty stamps from China. Is it faster than my practice suit? Oh hell yes. It was immediately obvious the first time I hit the water in it. Is it as fast as a $400 suit? Without a lottery win, I'll never know. But you know what? I don't care. I'm having fun, they're having fun, it's all good.
(This carries over into other sports I compete in, too. Take tennis-- there's some seriously wealthy *&%#s playing tennis, with their expensive club memberships, husbands who own airplanes, top-of-the line racquets, private lessons from a pro, expensive Adidas outfits, etc. I go out there on the tournament court in my practice shorts and tank top with my last-year's-style racquet and shoes with a hole in the toe and work my tail off to beat them, and it feels GREAT! Sure they drive home to their half-million-dollar McMansion in a 2010 BMW and I drive to a little apartment in a crappy worn-out industrial town in my trusty old pickup, but my point is that a seasoned scrounger and bargain-shopper can make do with 2nd tier equipment.)
Point is, it's not about the money. People who have less will find a way to level the playing field-- work harder, second-hand gear, bargain shopping, what have you. It's all good if it's all fun.