How do you determine whether you would be better off training and racing sprints or distance events?
I'm back into competitive training this winter after ~2 decades since high school. I used to coach age group, and I've been hitting some master's practices, so I'm not without direction for what I should be doing to get back in shape. I am, however, clueless about distance swimming.
I have no exposure to distance racing or training so I am starting to read up on it (Maglischo). In high school, with the longest event being the 500 free, everyone was a "sprinter" whether they were suited to it or not.
Since I'm basically rebuilding myself from the ground up, I am wondering whether I might give distance a try? What sorts of physiology, technique or psychology lend themselves to doing distance as opposed to sprinting? Or does this not really matter for a nearly 40-year-old masters swimmer that's been out of the pool for nearly forever?
Parents
Former Member
For me, since my level of training is closer to USMS than USAS, I'd probably rather use a masters-based rating system.
Really? You would rather use that tool? Didn't some crackpot chemist come up with it? :)
Your training is nothing like the typical USMS person.
I have vetted your tool, it still says my 50 is better than my 1500, and it has the benefit of taking a much larger range of times and spitting out a number > 1.
For me, since my level of training is closer to USMS than USAS, I'd probably rather use a masters-based rating system.
Really? You would rather use that tool? Didn't some crackpot chemist come up with it? :)
Your training is nothing like the typical USMS person.
I have vetted your tool, it still says my 50 is better than my 1500, and it has the benefit of taking a much larger range of times and spitting out a number > 1.
