I started a similar poll before,but time has changed things and I thought since USMS is going to have to do something definitive so they should have some input from the forumites
This is the problem I have with trying to put this particular genie back in the bottle. Unless your rules on fabrics are going to stipulate which materials the suits can be made of, AND the fabrication process by which they are assembled, AND the fabrication process by which the materials are made, AND the exact stoichiometry for the material, etc., etc., then you will have a rule that stipulates only part of the picture. Technological innovation is incredible when it comes to finding a way around rules that are not completely defined in the way described above.
Example: When is nylon not nylon? I see no reason why I couldn't (in principle) come up with a process that makes nylon with a small impurity in it ('s just nylon with a small impurity - possibly more pure than the nylon used to make "regular" suits.
My point is that once technology is let out of the bag, it's here to stay. The only way to stuff it back into the bag is to have the kind of specificity in the rules governing suits that any organization is highly unlikely to make, and probably doesn't have the technical background to conceive of in the first place.
They can go ahead and make the rules, but technology is very adept at finding a way around the rules.
True,thats why the size restrictions are important as long as they want to limit technology.For men there is just not that much difference that a Jammer can make.
This is the problem I have with trying to put this particular genie back in the bottle. Unless your rules on fabrics are going to stipulate which materials the suits can be made of, AND the fabrication process by which they are assembled, AND the fabrication process by which the materials are made, AND the exact stoichiometry for the material, etc., etc., then you will have a rule that stipulates only part of the picture. Technological innovation is incredible when it comes to finding a way around rules that are not completely defined in the way described above.
Example: When is nylon not nylon? I see no reason why I couldn't (in principle) come up with a process that makes nylon with a small impurity in it ('s just nylon with a small impurity - possibly more pure than the nylon used to make "regular" suits.
My point is that once technology is let out of the bag, it's here to stay. The only way to stuff it back into the bag is to have the kind of specificity in the rules governing suits that any organization is highly unlikely to make, and probably doesn't have the technical background to conceive of in the first place.
They can go ahead and make the rules, but technology is very adept at finding a way around the rules.
True,thats why the size restrictions are important as long as they want to limit technology.For men there is just not that much difference that a Jammer can make.