If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
And what about that all day Pepsi habit of yours, eh?
Suits aren't "unhealthy;" they're just (very recently) controversial.
Pls: it is Coca-Cola. And, as often as not, decaf. Coffee too. Caffeine can make me too jittery.
One can argue that any addiction is unhealthy in a sense. I will gladly stick to water/gatorade for an entire Zones or Nats meet if you stick to textile, even if rubber is still legal.
And what about that all day Pepsi habit of yours, eh?
Suits aren't "unhealthy;" they're just (very recently) controversial.
Pls: it is Coca-Cola. And, as often as not, decaf. Coffee too. Caffeine can make me too jittery.
One can argue that any addiction is unhealthy in a sense. I will gladly stick to water/gatorade for an entire Zones or Nats meet if you stick to textile, even if rubber is still legal.
