If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
Parents
Former Member
The whole idea of spending $500 on a tech suit for Masters seems completely ridiculous to me...
What about the idea of spending that much (or more) on a driver, or several times that much on a bike?
The whole idea of spending $500 on a tech suit for Masters seems completely ridiculous to me...
What about the idea of spending that much (or more) on a driver, or several times that much on a bike?
