If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
My son is 14 and swimming at the Western Zone championships this week in Hawaii in regular Fastkin Pro leggins against kids in full-body rubber wonder suits. He knows the value of his swims, and so does everyone else at the meet.
He also hates his father for it...
AND...the 6' 5" 130lb 13 year old just went 57+ 100 fly & 1:58+ 200 free...long course.
Thanks God he has his mothers genes...
My son is 14 and swimming at the Western Zone championships this week in Hawaii in regular Fastkin Pro leggins against kids in full-body rubber wonder suits. He knows the value of his swims, and so does everyone else at the meet.
He also hates his father for it...
AND...the 6' 5" 130lb 13 year old just went 57+ 100 fly & 1:58+ 200 free...long course.
Thanks God he has his mothers genes...
