If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
Another thread says FINA says the suit rule doesn't apply to Masters.To me that means that the suits must stay,otherwise we are at a competitive disadvantage to the rest of the Masters world.
Another thread says FINA says the suit rule doesn't apply to Masters.To me that means that the suits must stay,otherwise we are at a competitive disadvantage to the rest of the Masters world.
