If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
I agree Chris with your statements.
Perhaps USMS can allow suits in their meets and swimmer's can get a time, but it won't be included in the final results? This will help include those who need to cover up for whatever reason. Just a thought.
I agree Chris with your statements.
Perhaps USMS can allow suits in their meets and swimmer's can get a time, but it won't be included in the final results? This will help include those who need to cover up for whatever reason. Just a thought.
