If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
I know that I am not supposed to tout my blog on this thread, so I will not include a link. However, if there is ONE blog that FINA officials absolutely should read before issuing their final declarations regarding masters swimmers and body suits, it is today's posting:
FINA's Body Suit Ban: Unintended Consequences
I know that I am not supposed to tout my blog on this thread, so I will not include a link. However, if there is ONE blog that FINA officials absolutely should read before issuing their final declarations regarding masters swimmers and body suits, it is today's posting:
FINA's Body Suit Ban: Unintended Consequences
