If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
And the suit is already falling apart after one meet. That's an expensive meet for me: hotel room for four days and a suit that cost twice as much as the hotel.
One of the disadvantages of "textile" suits.
And the suit is already falling apart after one meet. That's an expensive meet for me: hotel room for four days and a suit that cost twice as much as the hotel.
One of the disadvantages of "textile" suits.
