If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
In 1896 the Olympic record for the pole vault was 10'6" using a bamboo pole. Today, with a carbon fiber pole, the record is 20'1 3/4". Better put an asterisk next to that one.
This is the second time today I've burst out laughing. The first was when I saw Geek's new avatar.
I wonder if tech suit support among masters breaks down by age? The 40+ geezers, absent John & co, embrace the suits and the youngsters disdain them?
In 1896 the Olympic record for the pole vault was 10'6" using a bamboo pole. Today, with a carbon fiber pole, the record is 20'1 3/4". Better put an asterisk next to that one.
This is the second time today I've burst out laughing. The first was when I saw Geek's new avatar.
I wonder if tech suit support among masters breaks down by age? The 40+ geezers, absent John & co, embrace the suits and the youngsters disdain them?
