If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
Parents
Former Member
I'm not a tennis player and am not really familiar at all with it's rules, but I think to make an accurate comparison between swimming/suits and another sport you really need both sports to be timed events that take place within the confines of a controlled environment.
I'm not a tennis player and am not really familiar at all with it's rules, but I think to make an accurate comparison between swimming/suits and another sport you really need both sports to be timed events that take place within the confines of a controlled environment.
