If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
Parents
Former Member
Ahhh yes.... the old "elite" vs. the average "john smith" swimmer argument. The great divider in masters swimming. You're either one of us...... or your one of THEM.
What a bunch of crap.
John Smith
No, the "bunch of crap" is how we're told that the Smith brothers don't take their swimming seriously.
Ahhh yes.... the old "elite" vs. the average "john smith" swimmer argument. The great divider in masters swimming. You're either one of us...... or your one of THEM.
What a bunch of crap.
John Smith
No, the "bunch of crap" is how we're told that the Smith brothers don't take their swimming seriously.
