If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
It's the cost issue for me as well. My wife likes the way I look in the tech suits !! How about NO Floatation for starters ? To the knee textile suits for men & women with a cost of under $200 would have the suit makers rethink how much technology to put in them.
It's the cost issue for me as well. My wife likes the way I look in the tech suits !! How about NO Floatation for starters ? To the knee textile suits for men & women with a cost of under $200 would have the suit makers rethink how much technology to put in them.
