If the full body rubber suits do end up getting banned, why should USMS follow their lead on this issue? (i.e. assuming the suits would continue to be manufactured).
Isn't Masters mostly for each individual to pursue what they want and the level they want out of the sport?
If the full body suit is preferred by many USMS participants, why not satisfy the base by keeping it available?
What's really the point of forcing old USMS swimmers out of their girdles if FINA bans them?
John Smith
Parents
Former Member
I think the current situation is kinda cool... lets say you like the suits, think we should have them...well for a few days you are happy, then a week or two later, you are sad, then a week or two later, you will be happy again, then a week or two later......... this way, no one wins, and no one loses completely...Political correctness has made its way to swimming. I am slow, in the new suits or out of them, so makes me no mind.:banana:
I think the current situation is kinda cool... lets say you like the suits, think we should have them...well for a few days you are happy, then a week or two later, you are sad, then a week or two later, you will be happy again, then a week or two later......... this way, no one wins, and no one loses completely...Political correctness has made its way to swimming. I am slow, in the new suits or out of them, so makes me no mind.:banana:
